ffutures: (marcus 2013)
ffutures ([personal profile] ffutures) wrote2015-04-12 06:09 pm

My suggestion for the Hugos...

...won't be popular.

Con committees presumably get to decide how the awards ceremony will be presented. If there is evidence that the award is being debased by the tactics we've seen, maybe they should minimalise their involvement to preserve the reputation of the convention. No speeches, no music, nobody going up to collect in person. Just a factual announcement of the winners, and notice that they can collect their awards from the green room afterwards. I'm pretty sure you could get the lot done well inside a one-hour program slot, and starving the idiots of whatever satisfaction they get out of a public victory for a year or two might teach them a small lesson. And the money saved could be spent on the rest of the programme.

Thoughts?

later - just to make this clear, I'd suggest doing this regardless of who seems likely to win, downsizing the ceremony only if the Poopies win would be as unfair, in its own way, as their initial tactics.

[identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com 2015-04-13 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, you do it regardless of who wins, since there won't be time for a change of plans if the Puppies lose. It's unfortunate, but the whole point is to be fair.

[identity profile] jordan179.livejournal.com 2015-04-13 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
Wouldn't you need to do it every year from now on into the forseeable future, then? And wouldn't that rather spoil the party for everyone?

[identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com 2015-04-13 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I have no idea how you get out of this once you start doing it, which is why it isn't a perfect plan - I never said it was. I suspect that after one or two years of spending a lot of money and losing most of the publicity and ego-boo associated with the award there might be less enthusiasm for gaming the awards.