You know, I reread that sometime in the past few years, but I didn't remember much of it at the level of sentence recognition. But its being Norton sheds light on its having a fantasy tone; a lot of Norton's sf had that flavor.
Of course you're right about "Gentle Homo," but it has a different problem: Norton systematically contrasts "Gentle Homo" for a man and "Gentle Fem" for a woman. But in actual Latin homo meant a human being of either sex (like Greek anthropos); the Latin for "male human being" was vir. Norton ought to have been able to look that one up.
no subject
Of course you're right about "Gentle Homo," but it has a different problem: Norton systematically contrasts "Gentle Homo" for a man and "Gentle Fem" for a woman. But in actual Latin homo meant a human being of either sex (like Greek anthropos); the Latin for "male human being" was vir. Norton ought to have been able to look that one up.