Here's my technobabble on how spaceship engines work and how to calculate fuel requirements and travel times in the Weinbaum universe. There will be a spreadsheet template to go with it, probably. The basic idea I'm trying to put across is VERY efficient nuclear power but only with low power outputs, e.g. you get near 100% conversion at 0.01g, but say 20% at 2g, so the faster you settle down to cruising speeds the better.
My illo for this will probably be a diagram of the early NERVA engine, the labels are close enough that it sort of works.
( Atomic Blasts )Does this seem coherent? What I want to avoid doing is giving actual power outputs for engines in the text, since I'm pretty sure that even at total conversion the "high" acceleration I'm using can't be sustained for long, you'd need vast quantities of fuel. Bearing this in mind, does this seem OK?
If any of the astronomy seems a bit off, blame Weinbaum - he gave Uranus a solid surface, not sure about Neptune but I might as well treat it that way, and made Pluto more massive than Earth
Later Edited to remove a couple of bits left over from an earlier draft which had the new engine designs produced more energy from a given mass of fuel. Not sure how that got past the techno-bullshit detector, now changed.