C'mon,. guys, get real!
Jun. 21st, 2005 09:46 pmCSI have just used the most ridiculous "find the vital clue" McGuffin ever... I know that what they're describing (without giving the plot away, it's finding a sound recording in an unlikely medium) is technically possible, and really has been done, but they didn't make any attempt to make it look plausible. You don't scan 1% of the possible recording area and instantly find exactly what you want, it's an incredibly difficult technical process that takes hundreds of hours. Yes, I know it's a 45 minute show, but this was just silly...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 03:00 pm (UTC)There's a lot of plot elements that are just silly. This one (if it's the one I'm thinking of) isn't really any more silly than a lot of their plot points...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-21 10:17 pm (UTC)I've heard from a few cops and real forensics people who classify CSI as a cross between fantasy and science fiction.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 12:30 am (UTC)And then there's the way they run DNA profiles at the drop of a hat. Typical lab turn around time for doing a DNA profile is two or three weeks. If they rush it, it can be done in three days.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 01:12 am (UTC)I have to exercise greater effort in my suspension of disbelief watching CSI than watching Buffy or reading HP.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-22 03:35 am (UTC)We got the feeling that the programme researchers read some old papers and thought "Cool!" lets use something like this!
I'm just waiting for CSI to start scanning dead eyes to capture the last image they saw...