ffutures: (Slayers CSI)
[personal profile] ffutures
CSI have just used the most ridiculous "find the vital clue" McGuffin ever... I know that what they're describing (without giving the plot away, it's finding a sound recording in an unlikely medium) is technically possible, and really has been done, but they didn't make any attempt to make it look plausible. You don't scan 1% of the possible recording area and instantly find exactly what you want, it's an incredibly difficult technical process that takes hundreds of hours. Yes, I know it's a 45 minute show, but this was just silly...

Date: 2005-06-21 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heliograph.livejournal.com
I think you should be more suprised when a TV show depicts something correctly.

Date: 2005-06-21 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robertprior.livejournal.com
I know it's a 45 minute show, but this was just silly...

There's a lot of plot elements that are just silly. This one (if it's the one I'm thinking of) isn't really any more silly than a lot of their plot points...

Date: 2005-06-21 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsample.livejournal.com
Sometimes its the stuff they skip over and ignore that bugs me the most. There was one episode where they spent half the episode collecting and comparing footprints, and when they've finally matched them to their suspect, they toss in an "oh, by the way, your finger prints were all over the plastic you wrapped the body in."

I've heard from a few cops and real forensics people who classify CSI as a cross between fantasy and science fiction.

Date: 2005-06-22 12:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
The thing that bugs me is that they could have done one of their sequences to show that a process is complicated and takes a while, which they usually do pretty well, e.g. when they show the face of a corpse being reconstructed by a sculptor sticking clay to the skull. Instead we got them sticking the object in question onto a turntable, shining a laser at it, turning a few dials, and instantly extracting a sound recording. It was insultingly over-simplified.

Date: 2005-06-22 12:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsample.livejournal.com
Even when they show something like that, they compress the time. A facial reconstruction like that takes days or weeks to complete, not a couple of hours.

And then there's the way they run DNA profiles at the drop of a hat. Typical lab turn around time for doing a DNA profile is two or three weeks. If they rush it, it can be done in three days.

Date: 2005-06-22 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondsilk.livejournal.com
My friend studies biochemical engineering and has had to clasify CSI as sifi-fantasy to stop herself yelling at the TV.
I have to exercise greater effort in my suspension of disbelief watching CSI than watching Buffy or reading HP.

Date: 2005-06-22 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulofcthulhu.livejournal.com
My wife and I are both archaeologists and we laughed our heads off when we saw that. Unfortunately I don't have the time to explain in how many ways that just woudldn't work.

We got the feeling that the programme researchers read some old papers and thought "Cool!" lets use something like this!

I'm just waiting for CSI to start scanning dead eyes to capture the last image they saw...

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 456
7 89 10111213
14 15 16 1718 1920
21 22 2324252627
28 29 3031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 04:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios