Date: 2012-12-23 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
Is the scientific concensus now that Tunguska was definitely an asteroid? I remember reading a while ago that they thought it could have been an impact by an anti-particle or something quite exotic like that.

Date: 2012-12-23 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Could be all sorts of thing, but I think the general feeling is a chunk of cometary ice is still most likely.

Date: 2012-12-23 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com
Hmm - that is pretty close.

Date: 2012-12-23 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
It's not that uncommon, this is just big enough to be a cause for concern - a little smaller and it would almost certainly burn up even if it did hit the Earth.

Date: 2012-12-23 08:01 pm (UTC)
liliaeth: (Default)
From: [personal profile] liliaeth
uhm, 2015, isnf't that three years from now? So are you talking to us from the future?

Date: 2012-12-23 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
No - the asteroid will be back in 2015

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 456
7 89 10111213
14 15 16 1718 1920
21 22 2324252627
28 29 3031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 04:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios