Another cunning virus ploy
Mar. 4th, 2004 11:40 pmReceived this tonight (read in mailwasher, needless to say with great care)
Needless to say "the attach" is a .pif file called morinfo, presumably a virus payload of some sort. That or Ntlworld technical support are TRULY stupid, because there is no way I'm opening an attachment of that sort.
Here's the full header, for anyone who's interested or wants to take a crack at tracing the source. I've replaced the usual HTML brackets with curly brackets in what follows and deleted my address:
Dear user of Ntlworld.com,
Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content) outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer safe, follow the instructions.
For further details see the attach.
Best wishes,
The Ntlworld.com team http://www.ntlworld.com
Needless to say "the attach" is a .pif file called morinfo, presumably a virus payload of some sort. That or Ntlworld technical support are TRULY stupid, because there is no way I'm opening an attachment of that sort.
Here's the full header, for anyone who's interested or wants to take a crack at tracing the source. I've replaced the usual HTML brackets with curly brackets in what follows and deleted my address:
Return-Path: {czVrldGLqVJAFwia@00.d0.59.f5.d0.2a}
Received: from dispatch ([67.164.248.44]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP
id {20040304155443.YOMD22458.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@dispatch}
for {xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@ntlworld.com};
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:54:43 +0000
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 08:56:56 -0700
To: xxxxxxx@ntlworld.com
Subject: Warning about your e-mail account.
From: support@ntlworld.com
Message-ID: {etchsvwvojumewsoxpq@ntlworld.com}
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="--------tjbeqniifnaoportlvak"
----------tjbeqniifnaoportlvak
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:41 pm (UTC)I'd still be getting all of this crap if I did have a mac. I'm sure you are too, if your email address is at all in the public eye.
I've never been infected with a virus in all the time I've had a PC; I'm fairly paranoid, was a beta-tester for the first PC anti-virus software in the early eighties, and have done my best to be VERY careful since then. I've got a hardware and a software firewall, anti-virus programs on all machines, and anti-virus and anti-spam software checking and deleting most mail unread. I don't use Outlook, and I don't open attachments unless I am expecting them and they have got through the virus checker.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:51 pm (UTC)What's frustrating to me is having to listen to coworkers come in the next day and complain about how they had to redo everything on their computer because of a virus. They don't necessarily keep up to date with the patches Microsoft puts out, which means they're part of the problem with the virus spreading.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-05 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
I use Mozilla Thunderbird so I'm pretty safe against attachments as long as I don't consciously double-click and run them but that would be stupid. ;o)
Still annoying, though. And this one is even more cunning as it builds on the fact that many current viruses mask the sender address.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:31 pm (UTC)<http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.beagle.k@mm.html>
As an aside, Slashdot reports that the authors of this and other recent viruses have taken to launching flamewars against each other in the source code of their viruses.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-05 08:29 am (UTC)