A reviewer on ff.net has just more or less accused me of plagiarising the final scene of chapter XVI of Dead Trouble - apparently it's similar to a scene in a story published four years ago. It's difficult to see how I could avoid writing the scene like that, given the essential ingredients of a certain reporter and a certain domestic appliance, and some need to make the reporter encounter the appliance, but apparently I am supposed to rewrite it to reduce the similarity. Yeah, right. I took a look at the story and am bloody sure I never read it - it's an angsty and VERY long pure Potterverse fic, a genre I tend to avoid - but I suppose that I will have to put some sort of disclaimer at the end of the next chapter.
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 08:24 am (UTC)With the hundreds of thousands of Potterverse fanfictions out there an author has to be knowledgeable of each and every one of them and if they do something faintly similar to a story that they may or may never have read . . .
I'm really trying to wrap my mind around that one. If you acknowledge them just remind them of the chap who sent his paper on his ideas about how animals change and adapt to their environment to a distinguished man of science. I am of course speaking of Wallace's letter to Charles Darwin.
And my compliments for all the fine remarks concerning Skeeter's fate. You certainly won over the Potterites over at TTH who were so avid for a knock down drag out fight between the Slayers and the Wizards . . . with the Wizards winning, of course.
pgavigan
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 08:44 am (UTC)As for Rita; well, they say that if you give the public what they want...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 05:20 pm (UTC)Just read one of your comments over at TTH about the trouble that the Ministry would be in for concluding secret treaties with domestic organizations that were out of control. I don't know if I was reading it wrong, but did you mean treaties with just one of the groups, the Watchers or the Wizards, or both?
pgavigan
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 04:43 pm (UTC)pgavigan
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 08:38 am (UTC)(Even if you had read the other story, it probably still wouldn't count as plagiarism. Is every movie that has a car chase in San Francisco plagiarizing [i]Bullet[/i]?)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
The same thing happened to Peter David, who wrote "Quantum Beast" (Part 1 (http://peterdavid.malibulist.com/archives/001260.html) and Part 2 (http://peterdavid.malibulist.com/archives/001259.html)), completely unaware that Lee Kirkland had already written the identically titled and similarly plotted "Quantum Beast" (Part 1 (http://jacalyns.u28.nozonenet.com/classic/classic_pg/qthrur/qballwell.html) and Part 2 (http://jacalyns.u28.nozonenet.com/classic/classic_pg/qthrur/qbwaiting.html)).
Some fanfic ideas are just so obvious that more than one person writes them.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 03:51 pm (UTC)I'm sure that's the reason why writers of shows never admit to reading fanfic, in case they wind up getting sued at some point for plagiarism.
But yes, a disclaimer should stop any potential moaning from the FF reviewer.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 11:31 pm (UTC)I await the insanity that will ensue if LJ are stupid enough to introduce a 'report abuse' button at the bottom of every LJ entry.
Tempted...
Date: 2007-08-21 08:28 pm (UTC)Of course, now I'm tempted to use a similar idea in one of my HP crossover fics. (I wonder how many times an idea has to be used before it becomes a cliche...)
Re: Tempted...
Date: 2007-08-21 11:20 pm (UTC)