Tooth and Claw - Artist!
Oct. 12th, 2007 11:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Just to say that
frostfox has provided some illustrations for the Tooth and Claw RPG, and I am already suffering from cute dragon overload...
Meanwhile, here behind the cut is a map showing the location of Tiamath and neighbouring countries - this is more or less agreed with Jo, I think, but there may still be last minute changes.

And this is one of my manips for the section on communications and transport

![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Meanwhile, here behind the cut is a map showing the location of Tiamath and neighbouring countries - this is more or less agreed with Jo, I think, but there may still be last minute changes.
And this is one of my manips for the section on communications and transport
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 12:47 pm (UTC)While I remember, given fairly hilly / mountainous terrain and dragon-sized bodies - and a dragon liking for travelling in open-topped wagons so that they can stretch their wings and fly if they feel like it - would the dragon railways be better off going for something like standard gauge, broad gauge, or narrow-gauge? Assuming I've spelled gauge correctly, which I doubt (but this isn't the PC with the UK spell-checker).
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 05:05 pm (UTC)Which a quote you had earlier says is seventy feet long for a five-hundred year old dragon, twenty feet for a youngish one.
Even with proportionately fairly narrow bodies I think it's going to have to be a fairly broad gauge, whether tunnels, embankments and cuttings are more expensive than narrow ones would be or not. Things like slate and coal mines might use a narrower gauge and be
manneddragonned by smaller crew who put up with being crowded though.