Date: 2010-09-18 11:20 pm (UTC)
I don't mean it like that. I know it's outdated and all and can be get quite a bit cheaper now than when it was introduced. That wasn't my point.

It's an old camera for professional photographers. It's not something a normal hobbyist would pick up usually, even second hand. Newer semi-pro and upper-range hobbyist bodies generally outperform it in most common tasks and are cheaper to pick up second-hand.

So there must be a reason that he chose it instead of something cheaper and generally just as good. May it be he's a photography snob, a former professional photographer or somebody who wanted one of the uncommon features this camera sported - like its environmental sealing.

And it's the same with the lens. The f/2.8 is the top of the range. That is some serious hardware you don't pick up willy-nilly just because you need a good telephoto lens to catch your neighbourhood MILF sunbathing in the nip.

Well, I guess if you had loads of spare cash to burn you could pick that one up willy-nilly.

And that's the thing I was thinking about - there should be some more interest in it,than just "that was a good camera". Because it was a good camera only certain people would pick. Especially when adding the lens.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6 78 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 05:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios