Page Summary
johnreiher.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nelc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ffutures.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ffutures.livejournal.com - (no subject)
draconin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nelc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nelc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ffutures.livejournal.com - (no subject)
keristor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nelc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ffutures.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-08-29 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-29 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-29 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-29 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 03:40 am (UTC)Humans expect the kind of density of stars in space that they see in the night sky, I think, which equates to something like 2000 pinpoints of light over the whole hemisphere, IIRC. You've got something like that number in whatever angle the frame makes, and a lot of them aren't pinpoints, but blobs.
Plus you have the foreground object much dimmer that the background features, which helps produce an uncomfortable reading of what the subject of the picture is meant to be.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 08:41 am (UTC)Also, I'm not sure where the light is coming from but even if it's directlt behind the camera it seems much too diffuse, there should be more contrast on the ship and rock.
(What did you use to create it?)
no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-30 10:45 am (UTC)