The Riot Act
Jan. 28th, 2012 11:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
What a shame that they don't read the riot act any more. I love the language...
Obviously it gets changed to Queen if the monarch is female. Imagine being the poor sod who has to read that out in the face of a raging mob...
Many years ago the BBC radio Today Show broadcast a version of the riot act recorded with the background sounds of a tea-room (chamber music, the quiet rattle of cups, etc.) gradually escalating to smashing cups and shattering windows as the act was read. Is it on line anywhere? Can't find it if it is.
"Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons being assembled immediately to disperse themselves and peacefully depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George for preventing tumultuous and riotous assemblies. God save the King."
Obviously it gets changed to Queen if the monarch is female. Imagine being the poor sod who has to read that out in the face of a raging mob...
Many years ago the BBC radio Today Show broadcast a version of the riot act recorded with the background sounds of a tea-room (chamber music, the quiet rattle of cups, etc.) gradually escalating to smashing cups and shattering windows as the act was read. Is it on line anywhere? Can't find it if it is.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 01:37 pm (UTC)Here's hoping our governor doesn't find out, or his Assembly cronies would probably enact the thing and use it at peaceful gatherings.
Icon: Bobby Singer's version of the Riot Act.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-29 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-28 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-29 11:00 am (UTC)"Lord Mansfield observed that the Riot Act did not take away the pre-existing power of the authorities to use force to stop a violent riot." (But the context was that he was clearing up confusion after riots where that was unclear, so it might well have discouraged use of force during that hour.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riot_Act#Subsequent_history_of_the_Riot_Act_in_the_UK