ffutures: (Default)
[personal profile] ffutures
Because I appear to be a masochist, I've just been re-watching the two-part Bones episode set in London.

Where I just noticed a claim that an ossified 2000-year old bone is "firmly in the Bronze age."

And looking up the definition of "ossified," I'm reasonably sure that they meant "fossilized" anyway.

Date: 2009-09-02 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karohemd.livejournal.com
Isn't an "ossified bone" a bit redundant?
I haven't seen the episode in question (or much of Bones in the first place) but fossilised would make a lot more sense.

Date: 2009-09-03 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dsample.livejournal.com
OTOP, if it was really fossilized bone, it was unlikely to be less than 10,000 years old. It might have been bone on its way to becoming fossilized.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 56 78910
11 1213 14 151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 07:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios