CD printing
Feb. 10th, 2010 08:42 pmI'm thinking of switching over from CDs with separately-printed adhesive labels to inkjet-printable CDs; there's very little difference in the price of the media, and I'm always a little worried that someone might get a damaged drive as a result of a label coming loose.
There are snags, of course. I can print labels relatively cheaper on the laser, can't print CDs that way; I'd need to buy an inkjet, and inkjet ink is much more expensive. Also, I can load a stack of labels and print them without supervision; that isn't true of CDs unless I spend a fortune on a dedicated stack-loading printer, which definitely isn't going to happen. The printer is going to be a bottleneck.
So - given all of the above, is there any relatively inexpensive inkjet which can print CDs fairly fast and fairly cheaply? Don't need particularly high resolution, or any other frills.
There are snags, of course. I can print labels relatively cheaper on the laser, can't print CDs that way; I'd need to buy an inkjet, and inkjet ink is much more expensive. Also, I can load a stack of labels and print them without supervision; that isn't true of CDs unless I spend a fortune on a dedicated stack-loading printer, which definitely isn't going to happen. The printer is going to be a bottleneck.
So - given all of the above, is there any relatively inexpensive inkjet which can print CDs fairly fast and fairly cheaply? Don't need particularly high resolution, or any other frills.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 09:28 pm (UTC)However to get the ink cost reasonable - we first installed a continous ink system to the printer.
I think the software as ok, but to be fair we captured the print job and sent as a raw print job after the first couple of prints.
This meant we didn't need to use any special software to print the alrady prepared images.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 10:42 pm (UTC)The one issue we had was it needed some extra support for the pipes about half way down the body of the printer to ensure they were kept clear (although it was only an occasional problem ) of the carriage. But a sticky pad and a bent piece of spare metal formed a easy and effective bracket.
IIRC You do use a bit more ink in cleaning cycles as you have more tubing to purge air bubbles from but to be honest , it's not a lot more and the ink is much cheaper anyway.
We were so impressed we bought a second one (and printer).
no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 11:02 pm (UTC)I've had Epson printers in the past, and have switched to HP, because I don't print for months sometimes, and the Epson's inkjets would clog and I couldn't unclog them, so I'd gone through a couple of Epsons but the HPs just keep working, or you replace the cartridges and they start working again (as I did this weekend for one that hadn't been used in 18 months).
But the continous ink system sounds stupendous, particularly for longer runs.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-10 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 08:20 am (UTC)I think the current equivalent model is the 640 now (http://www.canon.com.au/en-AU/For-You/Printers/PIXMA-InkJet-Printers/MP640). Mine cost about AUD$180 on special some two years ago.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-11 02:27 pm (UTC)