ffutures: (marcus 2013)
[personal profile] ffutures
It looks like Jack the Ripper has been identified by DNA evidence. And it's probably someone you've never heard of, unless you're a hard-core Ripper expert!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321

Not entirely happy with the train of evidence here, but it's more convincing than any other "proof" I've seen.

Date: 2014-09-08 08:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] twinfair.livejournal.com
As a continuation of were-gopher's comment, see http://io9.com/three-things-to-keep-in-mind-about-the-big-jack-the-rip-1631736706 for a few things to bear in mind about this story.

Date: 2014-09-08 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Wasn't aware of the book, but I'd agree it's fairly dodgy evidence, just slightly better than none.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 09:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios