![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It occurs to me that one of the reason why I'm dissatisfied with Dollhouse is an area of dishonesty - it's claimed, repeatedly, that male and female Dolls are given the same sort of assignments, but so far we've never see any evidence whatever that the male Dolls are being used for prostitution, whereas we repeatedly see Echo in this role.
And The Wire. Well, I really tried, for three nights this week, but I'm afraid I really don't find this show engaging my attention at all. Part of it is that I have trouble understanding a lot of what the characters are saying, most of it is that my memory for character names and faces is REALLY bad, and I have major problems following the story at all. Add to that that the BBC are showing it after 11 PM, when my attention span is not at its best, and non-comprehension is near total. Sorry, but I think I'm going to have to sit this one out.
And The Wire. Well, I really tried, for three nights this week, but I'm afraid I really don't find this show engaging my attention at all. Part of it is that I have trouble understanding a lot of what the characters are saying, most of it is that my memory for character names and faces is REALLY bad, and I have major problems following the story at all. Add to that that the BBC are showing it after 11 PM, when my attention span is not at its best, and non-comprehension is near total. Sorry, but I think I'm going to have to sit this one out.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:34 pm (UTC)Weird
Date: 2009-04-03 09:11 pm (UTC)I understood what most of the slang meant by context and, yes, there is humour. It's just the sort of very dark humour you tend to find amongst police and soldiers. For a good example of this consider the first conversation in the opening episode.
I find the utterly cut-throat departmental and city politics fascinating, and I don't even pick up on the occasional nods to real-life Baltimore politicos in the characterisation of some people.
But that's showbiz for you. Tastes will insist on differing.
Re: Weird
Date: 2009-04-03 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-08 07:26 pm (UTC)I suppose u nless they are soap opera addicts.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:22 pm (UTC)Re: Dollhouse... I don't know what episode you guys are on in the UK, and don't want to spoil, but there is a bit in one episode where they mention that Victor has been out on a few 'love bunny' sessions, or something along those lines, in a row.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 07:44 pm (UTC)That said, it is something they need to explicitly address, or else, honestly, I kind of feel like the idea of this show being more than an excuse to get Eliza to dress up in lots of different clothes is somewhat... less probable.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:26 pm (UTC)But I agree, too much of the prostitution implication for me to really love this series. I'm sticking with it because I love Helo/Paul Ballard/Tamoh, but it's not getting me.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-05 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 09:21 pm (UTC)But yeah, it's suffering from being thrown at a late night audience on consecutive nights. Not the most friendly way to show a series, especially such a good one.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 10:46 pm (UTC)On the fourth hand, if we had had setup scenes of Victor meeting his female client, that would have helped prepare us for the theory about his being Sierra's abuser. But then we would have lost the big reveal that the FBI agent's Russian contact is really a doll, which may have seemed more important.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 01:46 am (UTC)The thing is, though, that Joss Whedon has limitations on this gender equality thing. Note, for example, that we had lots of story about Willow and Tara, and then Willow and Kennedy, and we had a scene with Inara and a female client (and Jayne's line "I'll be in my bunk") . . . but we really haven't had anything close to a comparable treatment of male homosexuality. We have Inara as a romanticized figure, but no romanticized gigolo character. This has been consistently true. Whedon gives us the sexual liberation content that's appealing to a straight male audience; and he mostly gives us empowered women who are appealing to a straight male audience. This puts him way ahead of most of what's in the media, but if we lived in a genuinely sexually egalitarian society, he'd look awfully retrograde.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 02:24 am (UTC)And as far as The Wire goes:
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/03/09/85-the-wire/
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 08:09 am (UTC)Re the wire, I'm really not prepared to commit 3+ hours a week to any program - probably wouldn't watch Doctor Who if it was on that often! Thanks for the link though, that was pretty funny.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 10:18 am (UTC)Much like Mad Men, I wonder if The Wire deserves to sit on BBC4 where it will be both appreciated and allowed to gain popularity?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-06 01:43 am (UTC)The show really does reward the time you spend with it, so I hope you can catch up with it at some point. And HBO does need to make it dvds cheaper.