ffutures: (Default)
[personal profile] ffutures
If you are members of the crew of a spaceship, about to set off on a very short flight, and you're approached by an elderly Buddhist monk who wants to hitch a ride to your next port of call, what's your reaction? Assume that his presence aboard won't cause any problems re supplies etc.

Date: 2010-11-23 12:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pauldrye.livejournal.com
Depends on the nature of the ship. If it's a Traveller-style free trader, "hop aboard".

Date: 2010-11-23 02:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Sorry, should have said. It's a ship belonging to the League of Nations space patrol, the adventurers work for this noble organization.

Date: 2010-11-23 12:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aitkendrum.livejournal.com
I suspect we would let him travel dependant on what we were doing? Military stealth team, naaa. Traders/Freight/Private Yacht: Sure

Date: 2010-11-23 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
They're members of the Space Patrol, and the monk claims to have a good reason for wanting to get from A to B in a hurry rather than waiting for the next commercial flight.
Edited Date: 2010-11-23 02:43 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-11-23 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gbsteve.livejournal.com
Subject to the usual medical checks and willingness to pay, come aboard. Of course, if this sets of a picaresque Vancian chain of events all the better, we'll even skip the checks.

Date: 2010-11-23 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Works for me - thanks!

Date: 2010-11-23 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemused-leftist.livejournal.com
Hm, what is the DM up to?

Date: 2010-11-23 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Well yes, but apart from that?

Date: 2010-11-23 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] honorh.livejournal.com
Take him aboard, of course, especially if he was old, bald, and smiling. Never act incautiously around a bald, wrinkly, smiling man!

Date: 2010-11-23 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
UR TP AICMFP

Date: 2010-11-23 01:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanda-myrande.livejournal.com
Are there strawberries?

Date: 2010-11-23 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Might be at the next port of call. And no, this isn't the Firefly 'verse.

Date: 2010-11-23 02:21 am (UTC)
ext_196996: My avatar (Default)
From: [identity profile] johnreiher.livejournal.com
Let's see... We'd argue about it, both IC and OC, and after we've taken too much time, the GM will have the starport security/secret agents appear, guns blazing, and the monk, in the GM's best Lo Pan voice, will plead to get on, which we do, while returning fire at the law...

Date: 2010-11-23 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
The adventurers are the law, but the arguing part does sound plausible.

Date: 2010-11-23 02:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heliograph.livejournal.com
Does the side of the spaceship say "No Riders"?

Date: 2010-11-23 08:06 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-11-23 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robertprior.livejournal.com
Of course. He's obviously a harmless pacifist and helping him will help offset the bad karma we've incurred as adventurers.

Either that, or he's a secret martial arts master, and we might get some cool training.

It's a no brainer, really… :-)

Date: 2010-11-24 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robertprior.livejournal.com
Hey, if there's a downside, my inner player isn't seeing it :-)

From a meta-gaming standpoint, there's probably some cool plot complications coming out of this NPC, so I'd take him on board just to see what they are.

Date: 2010-11-24 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raygungothic.livejournal.com
Sounds like your character's wishes and your metagame urge are right in line. It's fun that way!

I get more irritated by (other) characters who are "serial plot hook refusers" as a player than as a GM. "To satisfy my curiosity" is a perfectly good in character reason, thanks :-)

Date: 2010-11-23 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
He sounds harmless, invite both him and his collection of esoteric sinister books onboard.

Date: 2010-11-23 08:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Excellent...

Date: 2010-11-23 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vicarage.livejournal.com
From all the comments above, roleplayers, or at least their characters, like to live interesting lives.

I wonder how many pick up hitchhikers in the real world?

Date: 2010-11-23 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
It's very much the characters, I think - but remember we are typically talking groups of four or five heavily armed people, who may regard one hitchhiker as less of a threat.

Date: 2010-11-23 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raygungothic.livejournal.com
Most of the characters I've enjoyed playing would be happy to take him on board... my inner voice as a player would be thinking "trouble will come of this" but I wouldn't let it stop me.

Date: 2010-11-23 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
That's about what I was expecting.

Date: 2010-11-23 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raygungothic.livejournal.com
I've played more cautious, responsible characters on occasion but it tends to reduce the game pace. Games where most characters are too sensible seem to bog down easily.

Also, in most systems, PCs know that they are very capable individuals. This must skew their world view a bit. Captain Daring, heroic pilot and successful space swashbuckler, has a lot more confidence in his ability to "wing it" if a tricky spot arises than I do!

Date: 2010-11-23 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Exactly.

Monk hitch-hiker

Date: 2010-11-24 12:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samthereaderman.livejournal.com
Depends. If I make my living using my spaceship to get goods and/or people from point A to B then no, since he's not paying. If however, I'm flying for a different reason - exploration, prestige, fun, then yes. If I'm military than no unless authorized.

Re: Monk hitch-hiker

Date: 2010-11-24 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ffutures.livejournal.com
Fair enough.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 23 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 02:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios